Abstract

This study employs the Random Field Finite Difference Analysis to assess how subgrade spatial variability impacts geogrid reinforcement’s strain-alleviating ability and the reinforced pavement’s rutting life. The geogrid’s abilities to reduce critical strains are evaluated using a strain-alleviating ratio and compared between deterministic and spatially variable scenarios. The analysis involves six geogrid reinforcement arrangements, considering two kinds of geogrid stiffness (G1 and G2) and three typical positions: top (L1), mid-depth (L1-2) and bottom (L2) of the base course. Key findings include: (a) Subgrade spatial variability significantly amplifies mean critical strains and leads to irregular strain and stress distributions, which in turn impacts the strain-alleviating ability of the geogrid reinforcements and potentially changes the optimal geogrid position. (b) The impacts of subgrade spatial variability on the geogrids’ strain-alleviating ability vary with the type of critical strains, the geogrid position, and the coefficient of variation and scale of fluctuation of subgrade modulus. When the geogrid is located at L2 (G_L2), its ability to alleviate critical subgrade strain is significantly compromised. (c) The adverse effect of subgrade spatial variability on the rutting life of G_L2 reinforced pavement is significant and can be mitigated by homogenising a very thin sublayer at the subgrade surface.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.