Abstract

Spacer design in spiral-wound membranes (SWMs) significantly affects the axial pressure drop in the flow channel but also the deposit layer removal. However, the effects of the spacer design and feed flow distribution in the module on the filtration performance have not yet been investigated during the highly fouling-susceptible fractionation of proteins from skim milk by SWMs. Therefore, a parallel spacer with no turbulence promotion and a less homogeneous feed flow distribution in the SWM was compared to a diamond spacer with regard to its impact on deposit formation and filtration performance. The experiments were conducted in a flat sheet test cell and in SWMs. The parallel spacer induced a more homogeneous deposit layer formation. However, no difference in filtration performance could be observed in the experiments with the test cell. Even though deposit layer formation dominates the microfiltration, its amount and spatial distribution could not be directly linked to the filtration performance. Furthermore, both spacers were assessed in SWM. Despite the higher crossflow velocity applicable in the more open channels of the parallel spacer, the performance of the parallel spacer was inferior to the diamond spacer. This was independent of the viscosity of the feed. Due to the high curvature of the membrane sheets close to the permeate collection tube, the cross-section of the flow channels in the SWM equipped with the parallel spacer was reduced. This resulted in a distinctly lower deposit layer control and performance, which could not be compensated by the resulting higher crossflow velocity far from the permeate collection tube.

Highlights

  • Deposit layer formation is one of the major obstacles in the application of membrane technology, since filtration performance is significantly affected by the fouling layer on the membrane surface.a number of works have investigated the causes and mechanisms of deposition [1,2,3,4]

  • Caused by a Parallel program fitted the data with an exponential function using a Levenberg Marquardt as an Deposit layer formation known toError reduce the filtration of membranes tremendously

  • We investigated the influence of the spacer geometry on the spatial distribution of protein experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Deposit layer formation is one of the major obstacles in the application of membrane technology, since filtration performance is significantly affected by the fouling layer on the membrane surface.a number of works have investigated the causes and mechanisms of deposition [1,2,3,4]. Deposit layer formation is one of the major obstacles in the application of membrane technology, since filtration performance is significantly affected by the fouling layer on the membrane surface. In the case of membrane technology in food manufacture applications, proteins are often the major foulant [5]. Proteins, such as micellar caseins, can form strongly compressible deposits [6]. According to Davis and Leighton [7], wall shear stress is the major factor for deposit removal from the membrane surface. Increasing the crossflow velocity results in a higher wall shear stress and a more effective deposit layer control

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call