Abstract

The quality of results obtained from surface geochemical exploration depends not only on the character of deep petroleum accumulations but also on the influence of many sub-surface factors. One of important factors is the presence of soil moisture in the sampling interval. This research presents the influence of soil moisture on concentrations of gaseous hydrocarbons in sampled soil gases. The comparative analysis was made on for two populations of gaseous hydrocarbon (methane, ethane, propane, i-butane, n-butane, propylene, 1-butene) concentrations measured in soil gas samples collected from the water-saturated (“wet” sampling interval) and water-free (“dry” sampling interval) environments. The comparison was based upon chromatographic analyses of 2974 samples of soil gas, in which 684 samples originated from “wet” sampling intervals and 2290 samples were taken from “dry” interval. Samples were collected in the areas of known gas deposits located in the Fore-sudetic Monocline (SW Poland). Samples collected from the “wet” intervals reveal higher concentrations of almost all analyzed hydrocarbons in comparison with samples from “dry” intervals. Highest differences were observed for methane concentrations and lowest — for total alkanes C 2–C 4. The increase of concentrations in “wet” sampling intervals can be explained by sub-surface accumulation of hydrocarbons caused by decreasing permeability of water-saturated soils, by the different solubilities of alkanes and alkenes in water as well as by recent generation of methane and alkenes. Considering the results obtained from the area of the Tarchaly gas deposit, it was found that surface pattern of methane anomalies does not reflect the presence of deep gas accumulations, as well as the total alkanes C 2–C 4 distribution. Hence, the procedure was proposed of elimination of soil moisture influence on the pattern of surface methane anomalies. The procedure includes normalization of measured methane concentrations to the reference levels of geochemical background, which characterize “wet” and “dry” sampling intervals. As a result, the distribution of anomalous methane concentrations was obtained, which, along with the distribution of total alkanes C 2–C 4, confirms the presence of assessed accumulation of gaseous hydrocarbons. Therefore, the proposed method is correct and supports the application of methane indicator as a petroleum exploration tool.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call