Abstract
BackgroundIntestinal stoma closure is associated with high risk of surgical site infection (SSI) at stoma reversal site. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the outcome of purse string approximation (PSA) compared to primary linear closure (PLC) of the skin after loop ileostomy reversal. MethodsData of 140 patients operated between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed in this two-center-study to determine the outcome of patients with either PSA (n = 44) or PLC (n = 96) after loop ileostomy reversal. ResultsPatients in the PSA group were significantly older than in the PLC group (64 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 18; p = 0.026). Cardiac diseases were significantly more present in the PSA group in comparison to the PLC group (59% vs. 38%; p = 0.017). Stoma creation was significantly more often due to malignancy in the PSA group in comparison to the PLC group (68% vs. 50%; p = 0.044). SSI occurred significantly more often in the PLC group in comparison to the PSA group (17% vs. 5%; p = 0.047). ConclusionsThe risk for SSI is lower in patients with PSA in comparison to patients with PLC. In order to diminish SSI we recommend performing a PSA in patients with loop ileostomy reversal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
