Abstract

Theoretically, the ratio of male to female offspring should equal the inverse ratio of the cost of their rearing. For birds exhibiting brood reduction, the cost of raising offspring sexually dimorphic in size may not be independent of the sex composition of the brood if males and females are not equally affected by sibling competition or are not equally effective at competing with a sibling of the opposite sex. Parents may thus manipulate the sex ratio of their brood to achieve an optimal combination of the sexes and to maximize their fitness. By examining the effects of sex, growth, and hatching asynchrony on the relative size of sibling bald eagles, I show that the probability of brood reduction is not equal among broods of different sex composition. The hatching sequence of male first and female second was predicted to have the greatest chance of experiencing nestling mortality. This type of brood is rare in bald eagles because there is a sex-dependent hatching sequence whereby the first egg in mixed-s...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.