Abstract

Purpose of this work is to study the effect of previous sensory information on the brain’s processing of current visual stimuli. Bistable images (Necker cubes) with a high degree of ambiguity (HA) and a low degree of ambiguity (LA) were used as visual stimuli. Methods. In this paper, we used wavelets to identify features of the brain activity signals. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare behavioral characteristics. Spectral power and event-related spectral perturbations were compared via a cluster-based permutation test using the FieldTrip package for Matlab. Results. We found that when the HA stimuli followed the LA stimuli, the activity of neurons in the sensory areas decreased in the early processing stage but increased in the later stages. This result confirmed the hierarchical organization of processing, where the low levels processed the details of the stimulus, and the high levels represented its interpretation. We supposed that processing of HA and LA stimuli was similar at low levels due to their similar morphology. Therefore, the brain might use the LA stimulus template at low levels to reduce the demands when processing the details of the HA stimulus. When the LA stimulus followed the HA stimulus, a weakened response in the sensory regions accompanied a high response in the frontal cortex. It reflected activation of the top-down cognitive functions, detecting a mismatch between the LA stimulus and the HA stimulus template. Conclusion. These results expanded the existing knowledge about the sensory processing mechanisms.

Highlights

  • We found that when the high degree of ambiguity (HA) stimuli followed the low degree of ambiguity (LA) stimuli, the activity of neurons in the sensory areas decreased in the early processing stage but increased in the later stages

  • We supposed that processing of HA and LA stimuli was similar at low levels due to their similar morphology

  • The brain might use the LA stimulus template at low levels to reduce the demands when processing the details of the HA stimulus

Read more

Summary

Методы

Все они заранее давали письменное информированное согласие об участии в эксперименте. Все участники были знакомы с экспериментальным заданием и не участвовали в подобных экспериментах в течение последних 6 месяцев. В качестве неоднозначного визуального стимула использовался куб Неккера [17,18]. Испытуемый без каких-либо нарушений зрительного восприятия интерпретирует 2D изображение куба Неккера как 3D-объект из-за специфического положения ребер куба. В зависимости от контраста внутренних ребер куб Неккера может быть воспринят как ориентированный либо влево, либо вправо Центрированных в левом углу, использовался в качестве контрольного параметра a ∈ [0, 1] (a — уровень неоднозначности). Поэтому управляющий параметр можно определить как a = g/255, где g — яркость внутренних линий. В нашем эксперименте мы используем изображения куба Неккера с 8 различными уровнями неоднозначности

Experimental procedure
Findings
Результаты
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call