Influence of radiation dose reduction gloves on exposure parameters, entrance dose rates and eye doses of interventionalists during mobile C-arm fluoroscopic procedures: A phantom study

Abstract

IntroductionDuring fluoroscopic examinations, radiation dose reduction gloves (RRGs) protect the hands of the interventionalist against ionising scattered radiation from the patient. Some fluoroscopic procedures may require the hands of the interventionalist in the path of the primary X-ray beam. This study investigates the influence of RRGs in the field of view (FOV) on exposure parameters, entrance dose rates and eye doses of interventionalists during mobile C-arm fluoroscopic procedures. MethodPolymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) slabs were stacked on each other to simulate patient thicknesses. The abdomen protocol of the unit was selected for the study. The entrance dose rates to the surface of the PMMA slabs and the scattered radiation were measured for an undercouch configuration with and without RRGs in the FOV. The exposure parameters were noted. The scattered radiation for an overcouch configuration was measured. ResultsThe entrance dose rate increases as the FOV decreases for a fixed thickness of PMMA. The presence of RRGs in the FOV increases the exposure parameters, entrance dose rates and the scattered radiation to the eyes of the interventionalist. For the first level of RRG coverage, percentage increases in entrance dose rates and eye doses for the 23 cm FOV for all thicknesses of PMMA slabs ranged from 1.0% to 17.0% and 20.0%–30.0%, respectively; for the second level of RRG coverage, the entrance dose rates ranged from 17.0% to 45.0% and the eye doses from 50.0% to 60.0%. Percentage increases depend on the FOV, the patient's thickness, and the size and orientation of the RRGs in the FOV. Scattered radiation to the eyes of the interventionalist increases with an overcouch configuration compared to an undercouch configuration. ConclusionSterile RRGs protects the hands of the interventionalist against scattered radiation. But in the FOV, they increase the scattered radiation to the personnel and the patient entrance dose rate. Implications for practiceFor best practice in C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures, appropriate FOV and C-arm orientation should be selected, whilst RRGs should not be in the path of the primary beam unless necessary.