Abstract

Abstract This report investigates the impact of different heat treatment parameters and varying Al-contents on the microstructure of Quenching & Partitioning (Q&P) steels. Therefore, three lean-medium-Mn-steels with Al-contents between 0.3 and 0.9 wt-% underwent heat treatments according to Quenching & Partitioning regimes. For comparison, the steels were subjected to a transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) aided-bainitic-ferrite (TBF) process. In both cases, the samples were fully austenitized at 900 °C for 120 s, using dilatometry. For the Quenching & Partitioning process, the quenching temperature (TQ) ranged from 210 °C to 330 °C, while the transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) aided-bainitic-ferrite samples were cooled to 360 °C. Afterwards, the specimen were re-heated to the partitioning temperature (TP) of 400 °C and isothermally held for partitioning times (tp) of 40, 120 and 200 s. Subsequently, these steels were analyzed with regard to their phase fractions and hardness. The results indicated that in the Quenching & Partitioning process, the microstructure was primarily influenced by the partitioning temperature (TQ), while partitioning times (tp) played a minor role due to the time-independent martensitic transformation during quenching. In general, rising quenching temperature (TQ) led to an increase in retained austenite (RA) fraction. In the transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) aided-bainitic-ferrite (TBF) process, a substantial influence of partitioning times (tp) was found, which can be explained by the kinetics of the isothermal bainitic transformation. Regardless of the heat treatment concept, an increasing Al-content contributed to elevated retained austenite contents.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call