Influence of pulse energy, tip design and insertion depth during Er:YAG‐activated irrigation on cleaning efficacy in simulated severely curved complex root canal systems in vitro

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the influence of pulse energy, tip geometry and tip position in simulated 3D‐printed root canals with multiple side canals at different levels in all directions on the cleaning performance of laser‐activated irrigation (LAI) compared to sonic activation (EDDY) and conventional needle irrigation (NI).Methodology3D‐printed root canal models (25/.06, length 20 mm, curvature 60°, radius 5 mm) with side canals (diameter 0.2 mm) at 2, 5 and 8 mm from the apex were filled with coloured biofilm‐mimicking hydrogel. LAI (Morita AdvErL Evo, Kyoto, Japan) was performed with six settings (n = 20; pulse‐energy, pulses per second [PPS], tip position): LAI1 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, canal entrance [CE]), LAI2 (same as LAI1, but insertion depth 9 mm before the apical endpoint [AE] [corresponding to 1 mm above the first lateral canals]), LAI3 (80 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, 9 mm before AE), LAI4 (same as LAI 3, but at CE) for 3 × 20 s each, LAI5 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL 2 × 20 s, CE & R200T (30 mJ, 25 PPS, 1 × 20 s, 9 mm before AE), LAI6 (30 mJ, 25 PPS, R200T, 9 mm before AE, 3 × 20 s). A continuous irrigation (3 mL/20 s) using distilled water accompanied the irrigation cycles. NI and EDDY (3 × 20 s each; 3 mL/20 s irrigation, insertion AE minus 1 mm, amplitude 4 mm) served as control groups. Biofilm‐mimicking hydrogel removal (ImageJ, NIH) was assessed for the entire system, the central canal and the lateral canals using standardized photographs with a microscope (Expert DN, Müller‐Optronic) and statistically analysed was performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests (p = .05). Irrigant extrusion beyond the foramina was also recorded.ResultsLAI2 (99.08%; interquartile range [IQR]: 96.85–100.00) and LAI3 (97.50%; 96.24–100.00) achieved the significantly best and LAI6 (80.08%; 73.41–84.69) the significantly worst removal of hydrogel from the entire root canal system amongst all LAI configurations (p < .05). There were no significant differences between LAI6, EDDY (72.89%; 67.49–76.22) and manual irrigation (54.39%; 51.01–56.94) (p > .05). R200T laser tip caused significantly more often irrigant extrusion than all other techniques (p < .05).ConclusionTip design, energy settings, and the positioning of the laser tip below the canal entrance caused an improvement in cleaning performance of the LAI. However, the small R200T tip created significantly more procedural errors (irrigant extrusion) due to higher concentrated energy.