Abstract

Recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a disastrous condition with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. However, the relation between location of previous myocardial infarction (MI) and in-hospital outcome in repeat-AMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Using the AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study database, clinical background, angiographic findings, results of primary PCI, and in-hospital prognosis were retrospectively compared between primary PCI-treated AMI patients with previous anterior MI (anterior group, n=151) and those with previous non-anterior MI (non-anterior group, n=157). Clinical backgrounds, angiographic findings, results of primary PCI, and in-hospital outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, Killip class > or =3 at admission, number of diseased vessels > or =2 or diseased left main trunk at initial coronary angiography, and age were the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in the recurrent-AMI patients, but not the anterior location of previous MI. These results suggest that among recurrent-AMI patients undergoing primary PCI, in-hospital prognosis mostly depends on the severity of acute heart failure at the onset and the residual myocardial ischemia rather than previous MI sites.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.