Influence of Preoperative Pulp Inflammation in the Outcome of Full Pulpotomy Using a Dog Model

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative pulp inflammation on the histologic outcome of full pulpotomy performed in mature permanent posterior teeth using 4 different biomaterials. MethodsFive beagle dogs (providing a total of 120 roots) were selected. Dentin exposure was performed in teeth from the second and third quadrants. One week later, full pulpotomy procedures were performed using 4 different bioactive materials (ProRoot MTA [MTA], TotalFill BC Putty [BC], Biodentine [BIO], and an experimental cement [ie, pulp capping material]). The hemostasis time was registered. After 14 weeks, the animals were killed. Pulp-dentin tissues were histologically and radiographically assessed. The significance level was set at .05. ResultsTeeth with previously exposed dentin revealed a statistically significant increase in the time required to achieve hemostasis (P < .001), therefore confirming the pulp inflammation status induced by 1-week exposure of occlusal dentin before performing full pulpotomy. There was no radiographic evidence of root resorption, periapical radiolucency, or lamina dura alterations. No statistically significant differences were observed between normal and inflamed pulp regardless of the evaluated histologic parameters. Moreover, histologic data concerning calcified barrier formation and the pulp tissue response show better results for BIO without statistical differences compared with MTA or BC (P > .05). The pulp capping material presented a lower performance, with statistically significant differences being detected in regard to the remaining 3 tested materials (P < .001). ConclusionsRadiographic and histologic outcomes of full pulpotomy are not jeopardized by short-term preoperative pulp inflammation. Moreover, BIO, MTA, and BC cements present suitable alternatives to be used as pulp capping agents.