Abstract

The steadily increasing interest in cyclic polymers has led to a plethora of proposed applications, particularly as biomaterials. However, the large-scale synthesis of cyclic polymers remains one of the greatest challenges in the field. One reason for this is the poorly understood role of the polymer structure on the cyclization efficiency, leading to synthesis protocols that must be optimized on a case-by-case basis without consideration for the chemical nature of the polymer. Recently, we found through a combination of laboratory experiments and molecular dynamics simulations that the polymer backbone flexibility has a major influence on the cyclization efficiency of poly(cyclic imino ether)s. Concurrently, we identified that a more flexible polymer backbone was also better solvated in the given organic solvent. To deconvolute the importance of the polymer backbone flexibility and solvation, in this study a variety of α-alkyne, ω-azide terminated (co)polymers of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline and 2–n-butyl-2-oxazoline with different amphiphilicities, but the same polymer backbone, have been synthesized and subjected to copper-catalysed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reactions in water. In agreement with our previous studies, it was observed that an increase in polymer chain hydrophobicity, and hence a decrease in solvation, leads to a significant decrease in cyclization efficiency. To further understand the effect of different CuAAC reaction conditions on the reaction outcome, different polymer concentrations and reaction temperatures were screened. This study highlights the importance of polymer amphiphilicity, and more generally solvation, in CuAAC protocols aimed towards the synthesis of cyclic polymers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call