Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether the fatigue responses to the same intensified rugby league competition differed depending on playing standard and physical fitness.MethodsPlayers from a high-standard (n = 15) and a low-standard (n = 16) junior rugby league team had lower body neuromuscular fatigue, perceptual wellbeing, and blood creatine kinase (CK) assessed over an intensified competition. Global positioning system units measured match activity profiles and rating of perceived exertion-assessed internal loads. Players were divided into high- and low-fitness groups across the two standards based on Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test performance.ResultsPlaying intensity increased with playing standard and fitness levels (high-standard = 92 ± 6 m·min−1 vs. 88 ± 6 m·min−1; low-standard = 88 ± 2 m·min−1 vs. 83 ± 6 m·min−1). Despite greater internal and external loads, high-fitness players showed smaller reductions in lower body power (high-standard effect size [ES] = −0.74; low-standard ES = −0.41). High-standard players had smaller increases in blood CK (77% ± 94% vs. 113% ± 81%; ES = −0.41), primarily due to very small increases in the high-fitness group (50% ± 45%).ConclusionsIncreased fitness leads to greater internal and external workloads during intensified competition, smaller increases in blood CK, and less neuromuscular fatigue. Maximising player fitness should be a primary goal of coaches in order to increase match workloads and reduce post-match fatigue during intensified competition.Key PointsIncreased physical fitness results in greater relative and absolute match workloads.Increased physical fitness results in less fatigue and muscle damage during an intensified competition.Coaching staff should aim to maximise physical fitness in order to optimise match performance and reduce player fatigue.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to determine whether the fatigue responses to the same intensified rugby league competition differed depending on playing standard and physical fitness

  • The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was a difference between (1) fatigue responses based on playing level, (2) fatigue responses based on physical fitness, and (3) match activity profiles based on playing standard and physical fitness during the same intensified rugby league competition

  • To assess the impact of physical fitness on match activities and post-match fatigue, players were divided into high- and lowfitness groups based on their Yo-Yo intermittent recovery rest (IRT) level 1 performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine whether the fatigue responses to the same intensified rugby league competition differed depending on playing standard and physical fitness. Johnston et al Sports Medicine - Open (2015) 1:18 damage, as well as neuromuscular and perceptual fatigue [7,8,9] Whilst this fatigue is generally transient in nature, typically persisting for 24 to 48 h after competition, muscle damage can last for 5 days [8]. Johnston et al [11] showed that the relative distance covered at high speeds was reduced by 50% and 60% in the final two games of an intensified rugby league tournament. Whilst studies from basketball and soccer suggest that recovery strategies, and in particular cold water immersion, may be useful to minimise fatiguemediated reductions in performance during intensified competitions [12,13,14], physical qualities such as highintensity running ability and lower body strength appear to play an important role in minimising postmatch fatigue in rugby league players [9]. Physical qualities may attenuate post-match fatigue following regular games [9], it is unclear whether they could help minimise fatigue that may occur during intensified rugby league competition [10,11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call