Abstract

Simple SummaryMonotherapy with pembrolizumab is the standard of first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a programmed Death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, pembrolizumab outcomes in real-world settings seem to be lower than those obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 88 patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% treated in first-line with pembrolizumab and we investigated the influence of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Stage Performance Status (ECOG PS) as a possible prognostic factor of survival. Our study showed that patients with PS ≥ 2 had poorer pembrolizumab outcomes with a significantly lower rate of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ECOG PS was the only prognostic factor of PFS and OS identified. To confirm these results, patients with PS ≥ 2, should be studied in RCTs and include other tools to evaluate patients’ PS more objectively.The KEYNOTE-024 clinical trial showed promising results for pembrolizumab in the first-line of treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the profile of patients in real-world practice differs from those included in this clinical trial. Here, an observational single-center retrospective study was performed through a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes after pembrolizumab therapy according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Stage Performance Status (ECOG PS). Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to detect prognostic factors. In our cohort, 63.7% of patients had an ECOG PS of 0–1. Regarding response rate, 31.8% of patients had a partial response (PR), 19.3% had stable disease (SD) and 23.9% had progression disease. On the other hand, patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 showed a significantly lower rate of PR and SD to pembrolizumab than patients with a PS of 0–1. The rate of response, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly higher in patients with ECOG PS 0–1 than in those with ECOG PS ≥ 2. In the current study, we found ECOG PS as the only independent predictor of OS and PFS. Due to the ECOG PS scale being a subjective parameter, other tools are needed to identify treatment effectiveness to each patient.

Highlights

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showing successful results in patients with an advanced stage of this disease [1,2,3,4]

  • There are three ICIs, which have been approved by the Foods and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC; atezolizumab [5] and pembrolizumab [6,7] have been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC and atezolizumab and nivolumab for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression after prior chemotherapy

  • We present the clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC in a real-world setting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showing successful results in patients with an advanced stage of this disease [1,2,3,4]. The KEY-NOTE-024 clinical trial [6], conducted in patients with metastatic NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression levels (≥50%), showed the best results reported to date in terms of response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Approximately 30–40% [10] of patients with NSCLC have a PS of 2 at the time of diagnosis. This subgroup of patients was excluded from most of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs in NSCLC [6,8,9]. Different results in terms of PFS, OS and response rate have been found across several real-world studies which enrolled 20–40% of PS 2 patients [12,13,14,15,16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.