Abstract

Pregnancy complications, particularly those associated with placental dysfunction, occur more frequently in nulliparous than in parous women. This difference may be a consequence of improved trophoblastic invasion and, as a result, improved placental function following previous pregnancy. Placental dysfunction in cases of fetal growth restriction may be identified by ultrasound assessment of fetoplacental hemodynamics and amniotic fluid volume. In this prospective observational study, we investigated whether differences in these measures of placental function exist between nulliparous and parous women, prior to active labor. Over a 2-year period, 456 nulliparous and 152 parous women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies were recruited to this prospective observational study. Each participant underwent an ultrasound assessment prior to active labor, during which fetal biometry, umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery and umbilical venous Dopplers, as well as amniotic fluid volume, were assessed. All cases were followed up within 48 h of delivery. Ultrasound parameters and intrapartum outcomes were then compared between the nulliparous and parous groups. Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had significantly higher fetal middle cerebral artery pulsatility index, cerebroplacental ratio and amniotic fluid volume. In nulliparous women, middle cerebral artery flow rate was also significantly higher and represented a greater percentage of umbilical venous flow than was observed in parous women. Prior to the active phase of labor, ultrasound parameters indicative of placental function differ significantly between nulliparous and parous pregnancy, even amongst an uncomplicated, low-risk cohort.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call