Abstract
In this study, we implement and compare two texture analytical methods, 2-D Gabor and GLCM, for residential area extraction from high spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery. We elaborately investigate the influence of different settings to the outputs of both methods. Experiments show that both methods have the potential for texture based residential area segmentation, while 2-D Gabor presents an overall higher precision and consistency. Increasing the number of features, however, seems to contribute little to the accuracy of both methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
