Abstract
Nonthermal termolecular reactions were shown to have significant impacts on combustion predictions of H2, CH4, and other fuels. But they are not considered in earlier model development efforts, many of which involve tuning or optimization. While adding new chemistry to optimized models is not recommended, we need to quantify its influence. The impact on model optimization has been examined on the H2 sub-mechanism of the Foundational Fuel Chemistry Model Version 1.0. The current work compared the optimization using the model as is, and with termolecular chemistry fully implemented, with new termolecular reactions and corrections to the stabilization reactions. The models optimized with and without termolecular chemistry have comparable performance and both could reconcile all the experimental targets considered. The two models show similar predictions under most target conditions, which can be explained by the compensation of kinetic parameters within their uncertainty ranges. Extrapolation of the model to conditions outside the target list shows larger discrepancy. While models with proper inclusion of nonthermal reactions should in general give more reliable predictions, it is expected that the difference can be minimized with a proper target list and optimized models can be used with attention on conditions very sensitive to termolecular chemistry. The conclusions provided guidance on model optimization with termolecular chemistry in consideration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.