Abstract

The number of amino acids that occupy a given protein site during evolution reflects the selective constraints operating on the site. This evolutionary variability is strongly influenced by the structural properties of the site in the native structure, and it is quantified either through sequence entropy or through substitution rates. However, while the sequence entropy only depends on the equilibrium frequencies of the amino acids, the substitution rate also depends on the exchangeability matrix that describes mutations in the mathematical model of the substitution process. Here we apply two variants of a mathematical model of protein evolution with selection for protein stability, both against unfolding and against misfolding. Exploiting the approximation of independent sites, these models allow computing site-specific substitution processes that satisfy global constraints on folding stability. We find that site-specific substitution rates do not depend only on the selective constraints acting on the site, quantified through its sequence entropy. In fact, polar sites evolve faster than hydrophobic sites even for equal sequence entropy, as a consequence of the fact that polar amino acids are characterized by higher mutational exchangeability than hydrophobic ones. Accordingly, the model predicts that more polar proteins tend to evolve faster. Nevertheless, these results change if we compare proteins that evolve under different mutation biases, such as orthologous proteins in different bacterial genomes. In this case, the substitution rates are faster in genomes that evolve under mutational bias that favor hydrophobic amino acids by preferentially incorporating the nucleotide Thymine that is more frequent in hydrophobic codons. This appearingly contradictory result arises because buried sites occupied by hydrophobic amino acids are characterized by larger selective factors that largely amplify the substitution rate between hydrophobic amino acids, while the selective factors of exposed sites have a weaker effect. Thus, changes in the mutational bias produce deep effects on the biophysical properties of the protein (hydrophobicity) and on its evolutionary properties (sequence entropy and substitution rate) at the same time. The program Prot_evol that implements the two site-specific substitution processes is freely available at https://ub.cbm.uam.es/prot_fold_evol/prot_fold_evol_soft_main.php#Prot_Evol.

Highlights

  • The evolutionary variability of an amino acid site in a protein family is an important indicator of the selective constraints that the site experiences

  • We adopt a model of protein evolution with global selective constraints for the maintenance of the thermodynamic stability of the native state both against unfolding and against misfolding, and we show that these two measures of evolutionary variability are not in general equivalent since they are differently influenced by the mutational process, which in general favors exchanges between polar amino acids, so that for sites with equal sequence entropy the site-specific substitution rate tends to be higher at exposed sites occupied by polar amino acids

  • We have to pay this price in order to address general questions such as the comparison between the two measures of evolutionary variability and how they are affected by the mutational process and by selection on protein stability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolutionary variability of an amino acid site in a protein family is an important indicator of the selective constraints that the site experiences This variability is usually quantified either through the sequence entropy (e.g., Goldstein & Pollock, 2017) or through the substitution rate (e.g., Grishin, Wolf & Koonin, 2000). When we compare different mutational processes, we find the counterintuitive result that mutational processes that favor hydrophobic residues, such as those taking place in the genomes of AT rich intracellular bacteria, tend to favor higher substitution rates This is a result that we argue is due to the differential constraints imposed by natural selection on buried and exposed sites

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call