Abstract

Purpose: Menisci transfer axial loads, while increasing the load-bearing tibiofemoral contact area and decreasing tibiofemoral contact pressure (CP). Numerous clinical and experimental studies agree that an increased CP is one predominant indicator for post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee joint. However, due to the immense variability in experimental test setups and wide range of treatment possibilities in meniscus surgery, it is difficult to objectively assess their impact on the CP determination, which is clearly crucial for knee joint health. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to investigate the influence of different meniscal injuries and their associated surgical treatments on the CP. Secondly, the influence of different test setups on CP measurements is assessed. On the basis of these results, we established the basis for recommendations for future investigations with the aim to determine CPs under different meniscal states. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were identified through a systematic literature search in Cochrane, PubMed and Web of Science databases. Literature was searched through pre-defined keywords and medical subject headings. Results: This review indicates a significant increase of up to 235% in peak CP when comparing healthy joints and intact menisci with impaired knee joints, injured or resected menisci. In addition, different test setups were indicated to have major influences on CP: The variety of test setups ranged from standard material testing machines, including customized setups via horizontal and vertical knee joint simulators, through to robotic systems. Differences in applied axial knee joint loads ranged from 0 N up to 2,700 N and resulted unsurprisingly in significantly different peak CPs of between 0.1 and 12.06 MPa. Conclusion: It was shown that untreated traumatic meniscal tears result in an increased CP. Surgical repair intervention were able to restore the CP comparable to the healthy, native condition. Test setup differences and particularly axial joint loading variability also led to major CP differences. In conclusion, when focusing on CP measurements in the knee joint, transparent and traceable in vitro testing conditions are essential to allow researchers to make a direct comparison between future biomechanical investigations.

Highlights

  • Traumatic meniscus injuries are one of the most predominant risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) (Cooper et al, 2000; Wilder et al, 2002; Roos, 2005), resulting in a considerable socioeconomic burden globally (Felson and Zhang, 1998)

  • A comprehensive and systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies investigating the meniscal influence on the tibiofemoral contact mechanics in human knee joints

  • The literature search strategy was developed using a combination of keywords and medical subject heading (MeSH; Table 1), which were extended to maximize the inclusion of potentially relevant studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traumatic meniscus injuries are one of the most predominant risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) (Cooper et al, 2000; Wilder et al, 2002; Roos, 2005), resulting in a considerable socioeconomic burden globally (Felson and Zhang, 1998). The wedge-shaped menisci actively increase the load-bearing contact area by compensating the incongruency of the articular surfaces of the tibia and femur, resulting in a decreased tibiofemoral contact pressure (CP) (Walker and Erkman, 1975). Like permeating root or radial tears, which are described to be biomechanically equivalent to a total meniscectomy, the major function of the meniscus is completely lost (Allaire et al, 2008). In such cases, the CP is dramatically increased, which will lead, when untreated, in the long term to the development of premature knee joint PTOA (Felson et al, 2000; Heckelsmiller et al, 2017)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.