Abstract

Rapidly warming climate, tightening environmental requirements, an aging society, rising wages, and demand for organic products are forcing farming to be more efficient and sustainable. The main aim of this study was to perform an analytical analysis and to determine the energy use and GHG emissions of organic sugar beet production using different weed control methods. Seven different methods of non-chemical weed control were compared. Mechanical inter-row loosening, inter-row cutting and mulching with weeds, weed smothering with catch crops, and thermal inter-row steaming were performed in field experiments at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania, 2015–2017). The other three, namely, automated mechanical inter-row loosening with cameras for row-tracking, inter-row loosening with a diesel-powered robot, and inter-row loosening with an electric robot were calculated analytically. The results showed that the average total energy use of organic sugar beet production was 27,844 MJ ha−1, of which manure costs accounted for 48–53% and diesel fuel for 29–35%. An average energy efficiency ratio was 7.18, while energy productivity was 1.83 kg MJ ha−1. Analysis of GHG emissions showed that the total average GHG emissions to the environment from organic sugar beet production amounted to 4552 kg CO2eq ha−1, and the average GHG emissions ratio was 4.47. The most sustainable organic sugar beet production was achieved by using mechanical inter-row loosening with a diesel-powered robot for weed control.

Highlights

  • The other three weed control methods for comparative analysis—automated inter-row loosening with cameras for row-tracking (E5), inter-row loosening with a diesel-powered robot (E6), and inter-row loosening with a solar-powered robot (E7) (Figure 1)—were based on analytical theoretical methods

  • The best greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ratios, showing the sustainability of organic sugar beet production technologies, were achieved when applying mechanical inter-row loosening with a diesel-powered robot (E6), an electric robot (E7), and automated inter-row loosening (E5), 5.80, 5.56, and 5.49, respectively (Figure 7)

  • For comparison, Four weed control methods E1–E4 were investigated in an experimental field and the refor the automated and robotic weed control methods, E5–E7, due to lack of equipment in

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Weeds are one of the main problems in crop production because they compete with major field crops for vital resources such as water, nutrients, space, and light [1,2,3,4]. Sugar beet is sensitive to weed competition, which can reduce the yield of sugar beet roots by 26 to 100% [2,4,10,11,12,13,14,15], even at low weed density of five weeds per 1 m2 [16,17]. Weed control is very important and can significantly increase the yield of sugar beet [11,18]. Sugar beet is an important crop in local Lithuanian industry as the main raw material for white sugar

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call