Abstract
Coal seams with a high CO2 content may have outburst risk, and degasification of CO2 has to be conducted before these coal seams can be safely extracted. For geosequestration of CO2 in unminable coal seams, injected CO2 may desorb with the reduction of CO2 pressure. Desorption of CO2 dominates these processes, while adsorption isotherms are widely used assuming that the adsorption–desorption process is fully reversible. To understand the difference between CO2 adsorption and desorption isotherms, i.e., sorption hysteresis, as well as the dependence of CO2 sorption hysteresis on maximum pressure, four cycles of CO2 adsorption–desorption experiments are conducted continuously with increasing maximum pressure (1, 2, 3, and 4 MPa). The difference of CO2 emission volume between adsorption and desorption isotherms is compared, and a significant deviation (0.059 and 0.032 mol/g) has been observed. The adsorption isotherms show a good repeatability, indicating that the gas holding capacity does not change during ...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
