Abstract

Background and aimsCoronary hemodynamics impact coronary plaque progression and destabilization. The aim of the present study was to establish the association between focal vs. diffuse intracoronary pressure gradients and wall shear stress (WSS) patterns with atherosclerotic plaque composition. MethodsProspective, international, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and hemodynamic significant lesions (fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤ 0.80). Motorized FFR pullback pressure gradient (PPG), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and time-average WSS (TAWSS) and topological shear variation index (TSVI) derived from three-dimensional angiography were obtained. ResultsOne hundred five vessels (median FFR 0.70 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.56–0.77]) had combined PPG and WSS analyses. TSVI was correlated with PPG (r = 0.47, [95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 0.30–0.65], p < 0.001). Vessels with a focal CAD (PPG above the median value of 0.67) had significantly higher TAWSS (14.8 [IQR 8.6–24.3] vs. 7.03 [4.8–11.7] Pa, p < 0.001) and TSVI (163.9 [117.6–249.2] vs. 76.8 [23.1–140.9] m−1, p < 0.001). In the 51 vessels with baseline OCT, TSVI was associated with plaque rupture (OR 1.01 [1.00–1.02], p = 0.024), PPG with the extension of lipids (OR 7.78 [6.19–9.77], p = 0.003), with the presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (OR 2.85 [1.11–7.83], p = 0.024) and plaque rupture (OR 4.94 [1.82 to 13.47], p = 0.002). ConclusionsFocal and diffuse coronary artery disease, defined using coronary physiology, are associated with differential WSS profiles. Pullback pressure gradients and WSS profiles are associated with atherosclerotic plaque phenotypes. Focal disease (as identified by high PPG) and high TSVI are associated with high-risk plaque features. Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials,gov/ct2/show/NCT03782688

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call