Abstract
This work used density functional theory to investigate both electronic and atomic structures at the interface between MAPbI3 and Sn-doped ZnO-nanorods. In the model, we considered two possible surfaces of ZnO-nanorod in forming interfaces with MAPbI3 layers, i.e. polar (0001) and non-polar (1010) surfaces. From the results, the undoped ZnO(1010)/MAPbI3 interface presents type-II band alignment, whereas the undoped ZnO(0001)/MAPbI3 presents type-I band alignment. The partial density of state analysis reveals that the trap state only occurs in ZnO(0001)/MAPbI3. However, when Sn atoms substitute the Zn atoms at the interface, the band alignment was found to change from type-II to type-I in Sn-doped ZnO(1010)/MAPbI3, and the band gap of ZnO was found reduced. However, for the Sn-doped ZnO(0001)/MAPbI3, the band alignment is still type-I and the band gap is almost unchanged. This means that how the band structure of Sn-doped ZnO/MAPbI3 realigns depends on how ZnO terminates at the interface (i.e. polar or non-polar), when Sn-doping is introduced. In addition, this band alignment modification of Sn-doped ZnO/ MAPbI3 was found to be originated from the contribution of Sn 5s-orbital at the band edge, which adjusts the band structure of ZnO at the interface. These therefore suggest that using Sn-doped ZnO nanorods as electron transporting layers may be useful for band engineering. Specifically, the band alignment and band offsets can be tuned with controlling of Sn concentration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.