Abstract

This study simultaneously analyzed the carbon and material footprints for three critical metals (neodymium, cobalt, and platinum) in Japanese households with different income levels. These metals are critical for new energy technologies, such as electric vehicles and rechargeable batteries, and are thus central to carbon footprint reductions. The policy implications of the trade-offs between GHG mitigation and critical metal consumption are considered within the context of differences in income. A global link input–output model representing national and international supply chains was employed to quantify the footprints according to household income quintile. In addition, the square root scaling method was used to compare footprints among households, considering differences in household size and their footprint characteristics. It is found that the degree of similarity among the carbon and material footprints for the three target metals was not very high [Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between them were 0.34 (neodymium), 0.63 (cobalt), and 0.10 (platinum)], implying that differences in relative household demand should be carefully considered based on differences in target footprints. The results of this study were compared to a similar study conducted in the UK to identify similarities and differences among footprints. In both countries, the carbon footprint intensity of household expenditure decreases as household income increases. The findings of this study also revealed that, in contrast to the case of carbon footprints, the material footprint intensities of household expenditure rise as household income increases, particularly in the case of neodymium. Consequently, the implementation of subsidies aimed at reducing carbon footprints and stimulating the economy should carefully consider the concomitant increase in material footprints. Importantly, such considerations are not only applicable to developed countries, but also emerging countries, the living standards of which are expected to increase markedly in the near future.

Highlights

  • Human society consumes a great deal of energy and resources in order to sustain economic activities and promote economic development

  • Triangles denote the material footprint per unit expenditure (t/M-JPY) for each household income quintile

  • 5 Conclusions We examined the structure of trade-offs between carbon and material footprints for neodymium, cobalt, and platinum, caused by Japanese household consumption

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human society consumes a great deal of energy and resources in order to sustain economic activities and promote economic development. In response to the sustained increase in anthropogenic loads on the global environment, environmental footprint analysis has been used to quantify pressures induced by economic activity (Hoekstra and Wiedmann 2014). Steen-Olsen et al (2012) quantified carbon, land footprints, and (blue) water footprints in the European Union (EU)-27 nations, which correspond to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, land use, and water resources, respectively. They concluded that these footprints are intrinsically different, they are mutually influential, and that reductions in one suggest a hidden trade-off with the other

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call