Abstract
The Arctic Ocean exemplifies the danger in using sound propagation and interaction models without a clear understanding of the physics of the problem or weaknesses inherent in these models. The zone-of-influence for under-ice marine mammals should be expected to differ significantly from that of open-sea organisms. However, increasing the effective sound attenuation, to empirically account for sound interactions with keel drafts, may lead to grossly erroneous conclusions from predictive and forensic studies. Ice elasticity and ridges combine to increase water/ice low-frequency sound penetration enabling long-distance transmission along this liquid-solid interface in the form of an evanescent wave. Consequently, sound pressure and exposure levels near the canopy are significantly higher even when the acoustic wavelength is several times longer than the ice thickness. Therefore, these physical mechanisms should also be taken into account in Arctic environmental impact assessment calculations. For example, i...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.