Influence of implant macrodesign and insertion connection technology on the accuracy of static computer‐assisted implant surgery

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different macrodesigns and two different insertion devices on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS). Ninety implant replicas with three different macrodesigns: Soft tissue level (TL), bone level (BL), and bone level tapered (BLT) were placed in 30 dental models with two implant insertion devices: Guided adapter and guided screwed-in mount. Preoperative and postoperative positions of implants were compared and the mean angular deviation, crestal, and apical three-dimensional (3D) deviation were calculated for each implant macrodesign and each insertion device. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, post hoc t-tests and Bonferroni-Holm's adjustment method. P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. BLT implants had lower mean 3D deviation values at the crest and the apex when compared with 3D deviations with BL and TL implants (P < .05). Also, BLT implants had lower angular deviations, when compared with BL and TL Implants, however, angular deviations were not statistically significant (P > .05). Considering the insertion device method, no significant differences were noted between insertion devices irrespective of the deviation analyzed. The macrodesign of dental implants may have an influence on the accuracy of sCAIS, with tapered designs offering slightly better positional accuracy than parallel-walled macrodesigns independent on the method of insertion used.