Abstract

Rural revitalisation in China relies heavily on the rural residential environment and is vital to the well-being of farmers. The governance of rural human settlements is a kind of public good. The external economy of governance results in the free-riding behaviour of some farmers, which does not entice farmers to participate in governance. However, current research seldom considers the public good of rural human settlements governance. This research is based on the pure public goods attribute of rural human settlements governance. It begins with government information and, using structural equation modelling (SEM), researchers construct the influence mechanism of government information, attitude, attention, and participation ability on the depth of farmers’ participation. The empirical results show that ability, attention, and attitude all have a dramatic positive influence on the depth of farmers’ participation, and the degree of impact gradually becomes weaker. Additionally, government information stimulus is not enough to promote farmers’ deep participation in governance. It needs to rely on intermediary variables to indirectly affect the depth of participation (ability, attention, attitude), and there is a path preference for the influence of government information on the depth of participation. As an important organisation in the management of rural areas, the village committee can significantly adjust the effect of the degree of attention on the depth of participation of farmers. Therefore, the government not only needs to provide farmers with reliable and useful information, but also needs to combine necessary measures to guide farmers to participate in the governance of rural human settlements.

Highlights

  • IntroductionDue to the limitations of the urban-rural dual system, China ignored the construction of rural human settlements in the early stage of development

  • Considering the information asymmetry in rural human settlements governance, this paper focuses on the impact of government information on farmers’ participation behavior

  • The governance of rural human settlements is a kind of public good, and the reason for the free-riding behaviour of some farmers is the asymmetry of information among farmers and the lack of consensus on action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the limitations of the urban-rural dual system, China ignored the construction of rural human settlements in the early stage of development. This led to the uneven development of urban and rural areas [1]. As an important place for farmers’ the rural human settlement environment undertakes the important function of providing farmers with the necessary means of production and subsistence. The current rural human settlement environment is facing a series of problems, including serious pollution problems in rural areas [5], lack of effective management and protection of infrastructures [6], inadequate basic public services [7], and poor village appearances [8] etc.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.