Abstract

Three different kaolins (K1, K2, K3) from sources in Cameroon were applied for producing geopolymer cements. The kaolins differ significantly in their gibbsite and quartz contents. Thermal transformation (700°C, 4h) into their metakaolins MK1, MK2, MK3 shows the total loss of crystalline kaolinite and reveal the typically rather broad bump in the X-ray pattern. Gibbsite becomes dehydrated into γ and χ-Al2O3. Geopolymer cements (GP1, GP2, GP3) were obtained using freshly prepared sodium silicate solutions (NWG) with a ratio NWG/MK=0.87. It could be observed that the initial (60/80/90min) and final (90/140/160min) setting time increases and their 28day compressive strength (49/39/30MPa) decreases in the course GP1/GP2/GP3. It is discussed that the higher content of quartz in K1 (up to 22wt.%), compared to K2 (10wt.%) and K3 (8wt.%) promotes higher strength values and decreased setting times. Gibbsite was not present in K1, but up to 11wt.% in K2 and 28 wt.% in K3, transformed in its dehydrated forms remains unreacted during geopolymerization. Therefore, the higher content of gibbsite in the kaolinite could be related to a lower strength. The reacted volumes and compositions of the geopolymer become almost the same in all three cases. A content of 30–50% of unreacted metakaolin was proved in all cases.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.