Abstract

Background and objectives: Wheelchair basketball players are classified into four functional classes according to the player’s “volume of action”, characterized by trunk movement and stability. As this classification is based on a kinematic point of view, test items might be differentially affected by the functional classification level. We aimed to clarify field-based skill test items closely related to the functional classification level. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six female wheelchair basketball athletes (Japan National Team candidates) completed seven field-based skill tests (20 m sprint, agility T-test, figure-eight with a ball test, the Yo-Yo 10 m recovery test, and three types of maximal passes), and anthropometric measurements were applied. Results: Significant differences among the classification levels were found for one-hand maximal passes (baseball and hook passes) and the figure-eight with a ball test. Furthermore, performance in the 20 m sprint and 10 m Yo-Yo recovery tests significantly differed between classes 1 and 4. Conclusions: The test items most influenced by the classification levels were one-hand passes, which require trunk stability and balance not only in the horizontal plane, but also in the sagittal and frontal planes. Coaches should consider which test items are strongly affected by the functional classification level when assessing a player’s performance.

Highlights

  • Wheelchair basketball athletes with mixed characteristics are divided into five main classes (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 4.5, with 4.5 reflecting the greatest level of functional ability) and three subclasses (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5), in accordance with the International Wheelchair Basketball Federation (IWBF) official player classification manual [1]

  • We examined three types of maximal passes in this study: the chest, baseball, and hook pass, as the vast majority of passes in wheelchair basketball are caught and made using one hand to protect the ball from a defender and to throw further [20]

  • The influence of trunk stability or trunk movement may differ depending on the type of pass, previous studies have not examined the relationship between the performance of various passes and the functional classification level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wheelchair basketball athletes with mixed characteristics are divided into five main classes (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 4.5, with 4.5 reflecting the greatest level of functional ability) and three subclasses (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5), in accordance with the International Wheelchair Basketball Federation (IWBF) official player classification manual [1]. Lower limb, and upper limb function determine a player’s class; trunk movement and stability are important for determining the classification. Wheelchair basketball players are classified into four functional classes according to the player’s “volume of action”, characterized by trunk movement and stability. As this classification is based on a kinematic point of view, test items might be differentially affected by the functional classification level. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six female wheelchair basketball athletes (Japan National Team candidates) completed seven field-based skill tests (20 m sprint, agility T-test, figure-eight with a ball test, the Yo-Yo 10 m recovery test, and three types of maximal passes), and anthropometric measurements were applied. Performance in the 20 m sprint and 10 m Yo-Yo recovery tests significantly differed between classes 1 and

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.