Abstract
Various schedules of fractionated photodynamic therapy (PDT), delivered at two different light fluence rates, were investigated in the RIF1 tumor model in an attempt to minimize the development of hypoxia during PDT and thereby improve tumor response relative to single treatments. The photosensitizers Photofrin and meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) were used in combination with either interstitial or superficial illumination. For both methods of illumination, equal volumetric light doses gave similar tumor responses, as measured by tumor regrowth times and number of cures. Fractionation of superficial illumination did not generally improve tumor response compared with a single illumination with the same total light dose. The only fractionated schedules which demonstrated a trend for increased cure were six fractions of superficial illumination given with short (1 h) dark periods between illuminations. Using both photosensitizers, an increase in tumor regrowth time occurred when tumors were illuminated interstitially with continuous light at a linear diffuser output of 50 mW compared with 100 mW per cm diffuser length. Discontinuous illumination with alternating light and dark periods of 30 s improved the tumor response further for mTHPC-mediated PDT at a fluence rate of 100 mW cm(-1). No improvement in response was seen by discontinuous interstitial illumination after Photofrin-mediated PDT. These results demonstrate that lower fluence rates and/or fractionating the light dose delivered can improve the response of the RIF1 tumor to PDT but that the choice of dark intervals between fractions is critical.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.