Abstract

In earthquake engineering practice, the liquefaction potential of soils is commonly evaluated through simplified procedures. These approaches are suitable for sands with very low to no fines content, which have been traditionally thought to be the only liquefiable materials. However, field observations and experimental research have extensively demonstrated that low plasticity silty sands can also be highly liquefiable. Thus, this paper investigates the effect of nonplastic fines contents on the liquefaction potential of soils, taking the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence as a case study. The validity of standard simplified procedures for high fines content soils is critically evaluated and compared with a finite element model based on a full solid–fluid coupled formulation. The model includes a state parameter-based constitutive law within the generalised plasticity theory, which allows the fines content to be taken into account explicitly. The standard simplified procedures are shown to be less effective in the evaluation of liquefaction potential in soils with high fines content but are still indispensable tools for evaluating the performance of soils over large urban areas. As the main conclusion, it is recommended that empirical models are complemented with an advanced numerical analysis in those cases where silty sands with high fines content are identified, as its outcomes can more realistically represent the soil behaviour during a seismic event.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.