Abstract

ObjectivesThis study was conducted in order to compare the effect of field of view (FOV) size on image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT).MethodsEleven cadaveric lungs were scanned with U-HRCT and conventional HRCT and reconstructed with five FOVs (40, 80, 160, 240, and 320 mm). Three radiologists evaluated and scored the images. Three image evaluations were performed, comparing the image quality with the five FOVs with respect to the 160-mm FOV. The first evaluation was performed on conventional HRCT images, and the second evaluation on U-HRCT images. Images were scored on normal structure, abnormal findings, and overall image quality. The third evaluation was a comparison of the images obtained with conventional HRCT and U-HRCT, with scoring performed on overall image quality. Quantitative evaluation of noise was performed by setting ROIs.ResultsIn conventional HRCT, image quality was improved when the FOV was reduced to 160 mm. In U-HRCT, image quality, except for noise, improved when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm. In the third evaluation, overall image quality was improved in U-HRCT over conventional HRCT at all FOVs. Noise of U-HRCT increased with respect to conventional HRCT when the FOV was reduced from 160 to 40 mm. However, at 240- and 320-mm FOVs, the noise of U-HRCT and conventional HRCT showed no differences.ConclusionsIn conventional HRCT, image quality did not improve when the FOV was reduced below 160 mm. However, in U-HRCT, image quality improved even when the FOV was reduced to 80 mm.Key Points• Reducing the size of the field of view to 160 mm improves diagnostic imaging quality in high-resolution CT.• In ultra-high-resolution CT, improvements in image quality can be obtained by reducing the size of the field of view to 80 mm.• Ultra-high-resolution CT produces images of higher quality compared with conventional HRCT irrespective of the size of the field of view.

Highlights

  • Smaller fields of views (FOVs) in CT are generally associated with higher spatial resolution and clearer images

  • Overall image quality scores clearly improved as the FOV was reduced from 320 to 240 or 160 mm

  • Conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT) image quality showed significant improvements when the FOV was reduced to 160 mm, but further FOV reduction led to slight or nonsignificant improvements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smaller fields of views (FOVs) in CT are generally associated with higher spatial resolution and clearer images. No studies investigated the influence of FOV size on image quality in U-HRCT. If the pixel size at a given FOV is smaller than the spatial resolution of conventional HRCT, the image quality cannot improve even if the FOV is further decreased. We hypothesized that even at FOV sizes for which the image quality is not further improved in conventional HRCT, an improvement could still be seen in U-HRCT. The purpose of our study was to compare the effect of FOV size on image quality in U-HRCT and conventional HRCT, so as to test such hypothesis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call