Abstract
The hard anodizing behaviour of aluminium alloy 7075 extrusion products has been examined as functions of variation in the impurity (i.e. Si, Mn and Fe) contents in the alloy and the nature of electrolyte used for the anodizing process. A combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electron probe micro analysis (EPMA) revealed that the chemistry, morphology and the mode of distribution of the Fe-rich constituent particles are important in determining the quality and the growth of the hard anodic oxide film. Using the conventional sulphuric acid—oxalic acid electrolyte, it was established that the Al 12(FeMn) 3Si-based particles survive the anodizing process, and this results in a steep rise in bath voltage with time as well as a non-uniform growth of the anodic oxide film. The extent of these effects are, however, greatly reduced when the Fe-bearing particles are aligned in a direction parallel to the growth direction of the anodic film. Studies employing a stronger electrolyte that is, sulphuric acid—oxalic acid—hydrochloric acid, on the other hand, revealed that this electrolyte is capable of counteracting the deleterious effects of Al 12(FeMn) 3Si-based particles by dissolving them during anodizing provided such particles are not too large in size.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.