Abstract

Simple SummaryThe diet offered to an animal in captivity may considerably differ from the natural one; this can affect the development of the digestive system, with connected influence on the health condition and welfare of the animal. Through a comparison of morphological and environmental characteristics of the rumen of red deer, we found out that, during autumn season, farmed deer have a limited choice of diet compared to wild ones living in the forest; this condition affected the morphology of the rumen wall and the composition of the rumen microbial population in the farmed animals. We recommend increasing the diversity of food offered to animals in captivity, with the aim of minimizing the negative effects of a poor variety of the diet on the digestive system.The red deer is an intermediate feeder, showing a marked degree of forage selectivity, with seasonal morphological adaptations due to changes in food quality and availability. In captivity, deer have a limited choice of habitat and food, and we hypothesize that this condition affects the rumen environment. Rumen samples were collected from 20 farmed and 11 wild red deer in autumn 2018 in Poland, and analyzed for chemical composition, food residues, microbial population, and rumen papillation. Farmed deer had the highest Campylobacter spp., and total anaerobic bacteria, but lower Clostridium spp. Moreover, they showed a decrease in Diplodininae protozoa, and the presence of holotrichs that were absent in the wild animals. The rumen digesta of farmed animals had lower dry matter and acid detergent fiber than the wild ones. The analysis of food residues underlined the poor variety of the diet for animals in the farm. This apparently affected the papillation of the rumen, with animals of the farm having the shortest papillae of the Atrium ruminis. Overall, results suggest that red deer kept in farms, with a diet based mainly on grass, tree leaves, and some concentrate supplements, undergo a small modification of the rumen compared to the wild conspecifics.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCaptivity can be defined as the condition when an animal (either domestic or wild species) is held in confined space and is dependent on humans for provision of all its needs

  • Captivity can be defined as the condition when an animal is held in confined space and is dependent on humans for provision of all its needs

  • According to Lin et al [2], the morphology of the gastrointestinal tract of Formosan Reeves’s muntjacs (Muntiacus reevesi micrurus) kept in zoos was modified by the captive condition; captive deer showed a different shape of ruminal papillae and a longer small intestine compared to wild ones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Captivity can be defined as the condition when an animal (either domestic or wild species) is held in confined space and is dependent on humans for provision of all its needs. This concept can relate, for example, to farms, private collections, breeding centers for reintroduction purposes, and zoos. According to Lin et al [2], the morphology of the gastrointestinal tract of Formosan Reeves’s muntjacs (Muntiacus reevesi micrurus) kept in zoos was modified by the captive condition (in particular the diet offered to these animals); captive deer showed a different shape of ruminal papillae and a longer small intestine compared to wild ones. Liukkonen-Anttila et al [4] investigated morphological and physiological disparities between wild and captive capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus) fed on different diets; as result, wild birds had heavier gizzards, hearts, and livers, and longer small intestines and ceca than captive birds

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call