Abstract

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, and especially in the absence of availability of an effective treatment or a vaccine, the main health measure is neither chemical nor biological, but behavioral. To reduce the exponential growth of infections due to the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and the resulting overburdening of the healthcare system, many European Countries, parts of the US and Switzerland gradually implemented measures of quarantine and isolation defined as lockdown. This consideration leads to the need to understand how individuals are motivated to protect themselves and others. Recent research suggested that prosocial mental dispositions, such as empathy, might promote adherence to social norms of distancing. Other research conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak indicates, however, that empathy levels might fluctuate according to anxiety linked to the risk of death, and this negatively predicted prosocial willingness. The present protocol proposes a study on whether people's empathic dispositions, interacting with the levels of risk, influence the psychological impact of lockdown. The rationale is that emphatic dispositions, encouraging the acceptance of the lockdown, determine a better psychological adaptation and less distress. One retrospective study will be developed in Switzerland and, if the pandemic conditions force a new wave of lockdown on the population, one prospective study as well. A total of 120 participants will be involved, distinguished by their level of objective risk: (1) high objective risk (COVID-19 positive patients, hospitalized in isolation in post-acute phase); (2) moderate objective risk (COVID-19 positive patients, isolated at home); (3) minimum objective risk (non-positive adults, in lockdown). Measures of perceived risk of being contagious for third parties, empathic dispositions and acceptance of lockdown will be collected. The expected results provide important answers related to the immediate impact of empathic dispositions, effective risk and risk perception on the psychological impact of lockdown during a pandemic outbreak. Data gathered from this study could inform policy makers and public health managers about the best communication strategies that will take into account the various stages of health risk and, in particular, to modulate messages to the population aimed at inducing self-isolation behaviors.

Highlights

  • In December 2019, originating in Wuhan, China, a new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged which led to an epidemic of an acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2)

  • During a worldwide health risk situation like the one we are facing with COVID-19, especially if effective treatments or vaccines are not yet available for all, the main health measure is neither chemical nor biological, but behavioral

  • The results of the present research will provide important answers related to the role of empathic dispositions, objective risk and risk perception on the psychological impact of quarantine during a pandemic outbreak

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, originating in Wuhan, China, a new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged which led to an epidemic of an acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2). The same authors found that the psychological impact of the restrictive measures was boosted by the duration of the quarantine, existing psychiatric disorders, infection fears, financial loss and loss of accessibility to necessities or daily routines, and insufficient information These pre-COVID-19 results have been confirmed by further systematic review and metaanalysis of mixed lists of diseases prioritized in public health emergencies [6, 7]. A recent study in the US [20] confirmed the need for promoting prosocial values: compared to messages that induce fear, prosocial messages capable of arousing a positive emotional state have proved to be more effective in the willingness to accept self-isolation Another recent study [21] suggests that prosocial mental dispositions, such as empathy, might promote adherence to social norms of distancing, hygiene practices, and may influence the psychological impact of measures restricting individual freedom. RQ2: to what extent does objective risk in combination with empathic dispositions predict the psychological impact of the lockdown? Figure 1 shows the model tested

METHODS
Participants
Procedure
Ethical Considerations
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.