Abstract

Two membrane-photosensitizing dyes were used to investigate whether selected sites in the plasma membrane vary in their sensitivity to damage by singlet oxygen (1O2∗) and, if so, what factors are responsible for the variation. The relative ability of Rose bengal (RB) and merocyanine 540 (MC540), both of which localize in the plasma membrane and produce 1O2∗, to photosensitize five plasma membrane functions in P388D1 cells was evaluated. The five membrane functions assessed were: plasma membrane potential, proline transport, facilitated glucose diffusion, 5′-nucleotidase activity, and dye exclusion. Photosensitization efficiency by RB varied by a factor of 188 for these membrane functions, whereas for MC540 a range of only 24 was found. RB was a more efficient photosensitizer than MC540 but the relative efficiencies varied with the membrane function. The wide range of P50 values for RB suggests that it binds selectively to membrane sites where it causes damage with high efficiency; possibly a non-1O2∗ mechanism is involved. In contrast, MC540 photosensitized the three membrane functions involving integral membrane proteins about equally suggesting that differences are due to small variations in the distribution of MC540 in the plasma membrane and/or variations in the inherent reactivity of the membrane targets with 1O2∗. The results indicate that the lability of membrane sites to photosensitization depends both on their inherent reactivity with 1O2∗ and the relative location of specific protein and dye molecules.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.