Abstract
Analysis of a variety of surfactant aggregation processes (monomer-to-micelle, spherical micelle-to-rod shaped micelle – s → r – transition, micellar growth and clouding phenomenon) in aqueous ureas or thioureas presented here shows a different picture that differs from the earlier literature reports (i.e., urea postpones the surfactant aggregation). Evidence has been collected on the basis of critical micelle concentration (cmc, obtained from conductometry), [1-pentanol] needed for s → r transition (obtained from viscometry), aggregation number (obtained from small angle neutron scattering) and cloud point (CP) measurements. All of these effects are attributed to urea-assisted aggregation up to certain concentration, which depends upon the nature and presence of number of methylene groups in a particular urea. The results are explained on the basis of influence of the additive on solvent water, adsorption on headgroup and hydrocarbon tail and size of the additive. The results may find application in understanding the mechanism of protein denaturation/renaturation by the presence of different additives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
