Abstract
All business organizations including those in the building and construction sector are always concerned about their financial performance. This is usually with respect to how their operating, investing and financing activities not only help generate revenues but also how to keep the costs of all this operations down so as to optimize on business profitability. Despite the concern for financial performance in general and profitability in particular, it is still not clear how the current assets structure (that reflects business policy on management of current assets) affect the financial performance of companies in the building and construction sector in Kenya. The variations in the asset management policies across the industry is reflected in the variations in the asset structure ranging from very low current asset to total asset ratios to very high of these ratios. Despite the variations in the current asset management policies, there is lack of empirical and theoretical clarity as to how the current asset structure influences profitability of these companies. Empirically, extant research arrives at conflicting findings as to how asset management is related to financial performance. Theoretically, whereas the portfolio theory of Markowtz (1952) recommend optimal asset structuring to minimize risk and therefore boost performance, the agency theory of Jensen and Meckling (1976) on the other hand fail to pinpoint a clear association between the current asset structure and financial performance. The trade-off theory of Gitman (1974) implies inverse relationship between liquidity and profitability. This study is designed as a causal exploratory survey using the largest 44 companies in the building and construction sector in Kenya over a 5 year period covering 2016 to 2021. This forms 220 firm-year observations. Fixed effects bivariate panel regression model was adopted after conducting model specification tests. The test of hypothesis was conducted using the t-statistic at 95% confidence interval. Based on the positivist research philosophy, the findings reveal that current asset structure (CAS) as measured by the current asset to total assets ratio had a negative effect on financial performance as measured by return on equity and net profit margin. This supports the optimal asset structuring to balance off the risk return trade-off. The study was limited to the large firms in the building and construction sector and recommends an enhanced sample for all company sizes to check out if size has an effect on the robustness of the findings. Keywords: Current Asset Structure; Financial Performance; Profitability DOI: 10.7176/RJFA/13-4-03 Publication date: February 28 th 2022
Highlights
Asset management is a subset of financial management (Lakew & Rao, 2014)
Based on the positivist research philosophy, the findings reveal that current asset structure (CAS) as measured by the current asset to total assets ratio had a negative effect on financial performance as measured by return on equity and net profit margin
The study is oriented in the positivism philosophy which in the context of this study as per Aliyu, Bello, Kasim and Martin (2014) espouses the scientific approach to design that started from problem identification that it is clear how current asset structure influences financial performance of companies in the building and construction industry
Summary
Financial management is one of the several functional areas of management which is center to the success of any business. It involves planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling the financial resources of a business and how they are deployed to achieve organizational success. In a nutshell it revolves around the decisions of financial managers with respect to capital budgeting, financing, working capital, dividend, capital structure and risk management decisions. Inefficient financial management, combined with the uncertainty of the business environment often lead business enterprises to serious problems (Lakew & Rao, 2014).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
