Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the effective dose (E) and convolution kernel’s effects on the detection of pulmonary nodules in different artificial intelligence (AI) software systems. MethodsSimulated nodules of various sizes and densities in the Lungman phantom were CT scanned at different levels of E (3 − 5, 1 − 3, 0.5 − 1, and <0.5 mSv) and were reconstructed with different kernels (B30f, B60f, and B80f). The number of nodules and corresponding volumes in different images were detected by four AI software systems (A, B, C, and D). Sensitivity, false positives (FPs), false negatives (FNs), and relative volume error (RVE) were calculated and compared to the aspects of the E and convolution kernel. ResultsSystem B had the highest median sensitivity (100 %). The median FPs of systems B (1) and D (1) was lower than A (11.5) and C (5). System D had the smallest RVE (13.12 %). When the E was <0.5 mSv, system D’s sensitivity decreased, while the FPs and FNs of systems A and B increased significantly (P < 0.05). When the kernel was changed from B80f to B30f, the FPs of system A decreased, while that of system C increased, and the RVE of systems A, B, and C increased (P < 0.05). ConclusionAI software systems B and D have high detection efficiency under normal or low dose conditions and show better stability. However, the detection efficiency of systems A and C would be affected by the E or convolution kernel, but the E would not affect the volume measurement of four systems.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.