Influence of crop rotation and aggregate size on carbon dioxide production and denitrification

Abstract

The influence of soil and crop management practices on soil aggregation is well documented; however very little information is available on the impact of aggregation on biological processes such as greenhouse gas emissions. Soils (Ap horizon of a Brookston clay loam) were sampled in the spring of 2002 from two treatments in a long-term study (established in 1959). The treatments included continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) and the corn phase of a 4-year crop rotation which included corn–oats ( Avena sativa L.)–alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)–alfalfa. The continuous corn (CC) treatment was plowed every fall whereas the rotation corn (RC) treatment was plowed 2 out of the 4 years (in the fall following second year alfalfa and following corn). The objectives were to determine the impact of crop rotation and continuous corn on aggregate size distribution, and the influence of aggregate size on CO 2 and N 2O production through denitrification. The soil samples were separated into six aggregate size fractions (<0.25, 0.25–0.50, 0.50–1.0, 1.0–2.0, 2.0–4.0, and 4.0–8.0 mm diameter) using a dry sieving procedure. Each aggregate size fraction was separated into two subsamples with one subsample left intact and the other ground to <0.15 mm (100-mesh sieve). The intact and ground aggregates from each size fraction were incubated anaerobically using the acetylene inhibition technique and carbon dioxide (CO 2) and nitrous oxide (N 2O) production (denitrification) were determined. Nitrate was added and thus not limiting in the incubations. In both cropping treatments, the 2–4 mm aggregate size was the dominant size fraction (∼35–45% of the soil by weight) followed by the 1–2 mm size fraction (∼20–25% of the soil by weight). Crop rotation increased both CO 2 and N 2O production (denitrification) and the proportion of <2 mm diameter aggregates compared to continuous corn. For intact aggregates, CO 2 production decreased with increasing aggregate size, while N 2O production (denitrification) increased with increasing aggregate size. When the aggregates were ground, CO 2 production was independent of the original aggregate size, while N 2O production (denitrification) decreased as the size of the original aggregates increased. This study demonstrates that both the size distribution of natural soil aggregates and soil grinding can have substantial impacts on the CO 2 and N 2O production through denitrification.