Abstract

The application of mechanisms such as exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) coupled with variable valve timing (VVT) and a variable geometry turbocharger (VGT) can improve engine efficiency; however, the energy laws and loss distribution after EGR, VVT, and VGT changes are unclear, restricting the optimization of engine structures and corresponding strategies. Herein, a six-cylinder engine is studied, revealing that the cooling loss of the high-pressure (HP) EGR loop is an important factor affecting the engine energy distribution. The cooling loss accounts for 10.00%–20.00% of the total energy, with an average increase of 1.73%, surpassing other energy losses growth rates. The low-pressure (LP) EGR loop considerably reduces cooling losses. The cooling loss of the LP EGR loop is only 64.05% of the HP EGR loop at a 20% EGR rate. When the EGR rate is >10%, the resulting lower cooling losses effectively improve the engine efficiency and the indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) of the LP EGR loop is 0.20%–0.33% higher than that of the HP EGR loop; when the EGR rate is 21%, the ITE of the LP EGR loop reaches 49.52%. By studying the variation in exergy with operating parameters, it is found that while increasing the EGR rate from 15% to 20%, the proportion of available exergy increases by adjusting the VVT to −85° crank angle after top dead center (CA ATDC) or adjusting the VGT to 47.5% under the original operating scheme of the LP EGR loop (−146° CA ATDC; VGT = 42.5%). The available exergy increases from 71.22%–71.42% (−146° CA ATDC; VGT = 42.5%; original device) to 71.88%–71.58% (−146° CA ATDC; VGT = 47.5%) and 72.02%–72.21% (−85° CA ATDC; VGT = 42.5%). This study explores the energy distribution under different operating schemes, providing theoretical guidance for further improving the thermal efficiency of the entire device.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call