Abstract
Transition-probability estimates derived from contextual word predictions of subjects who were high in divergent and convergent productive thinking were compared with those of subjects low in convergent and divergent productive thinking. No significant differences were observed in transition-probability estimates or in prediction strategies employed by the two groups of subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.