Abstract
The main goal of the present investigation is the comparison between conventional Marshall and Superpave design methods for resistance to rutting if applied in the mix design of the wearing course layers in flexible pavements. Detailed work is completed to accomplish the goals of the study by implementing Marshall and Superpave specimens through utilizing aggregate from AL-Taji Quarry and asphalt cement with (40-50) grade from Dourah refinery plant and one sort of mineral filler. Specimens were fabricated by Marshall and Superpave methods and tested by creep tests to evaluate the strain for these mixes. The effect of compaction method and additives were investigated on the performance of these mixes. From the analysis results, it appears that; the Superpave blends are increasingly practical as compared to those with conventional Marshall blends. In addition, adding carbon fibers and lime to the blends decreases the strain mixture. It is additionally seen that the Superpave Gyratory compactor is equipped for accomplishing lower air void contents than the Marshall hammer. Furthermore, the Superpave mix reflects better resistance against permanent deformation. Finally, the present study recognizes the importance of using the Superpave system for design asphalt mix instead of the Marshall method in Iraq.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.