Influence of central metalloligand geometry on electronic communication between metals: syntheses, crystal structures, MMCT properties of isomeric cyanido-bridged Fe2Ru complexes, and TDDFT calculations.

Abstract

To investigate how the central metalloligand geometry influences distant or vicinal metal-to-metal charge-transfer (MMCT) properties of polynuclear complexes, cis- and trans-isomeric heterotrimetallic complexes, and their one- and two-electron oxidation products, cis/trans-[Cp(dppe)Fe(II)NCRu(II)(phen)2CN-Fe(II)(dppe)Cp][PF6]2 (cis/trans-1[PF6]2), cis/trans-[Cp(dppe)Fe(II)NCRu(II)(phen)2CNFe(III)-(dppe)Cp][PF6]3 (cis/trans-1[PF6]3) and cis/trans-[Cp(dppe)Fe(III)NCRu(II)(phen)2CN-Fe(III)(dppe)Cp][PF6]4 (cis/trans-1[PF6]4) have been synthesized and characterized. Electrochemical measurements show the presence of electronic interactions between the two external Fe(II) atoms of the cis- and trans-isomeric complexes cis/trans-1[PF6]2. The electronic properties of all these complexes were studied and compared by spectroscopic techniques and TDDFT//DFT calculations. As expected, both mixed valence complexes cis/trans-1[PF6]3 exhibited different strong absorption signals in the NIR region, which should mainly be attributed to a transition from an MO that is delocalized over the Ru(II)-CN-Fe(II) subunit to a Fe(III) d orbital with some contributions from the co-ligands. Moreover, the NIR transition energy in trans-1[PF6]3 is lower than that in cis-1[PF6]3, which is related to the symmetry of their molecular orbitals on the basis of the molecular orbital analysis. Also, the electronic spectra of the two-electron oxidized complexes show that trans-1[PF6]4 possesses lower vicinal Ru(II) → Fe(III) MMCT transition energy than cis-1[PF6]4. Moreover, the assignment of MMCT transition of the oxidized products and the differences of the electronic properties between the cis and trans complexes can be well rationalized using TDDFT//DFT calculations.