Abstract

The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate correlations among platelet, leukocyte, growth factor, and cytokine concentrations in canine platelet-rich plasmas (PRPs) produced from five different canine PRP-concentrating systems and (2) compare the effects of different activation protocols on platelet activation and growth factor release from one of these PRPs. PRP was made using blood from 15 dogs and each of 5 different PRP systems in a cross-over design. Complete blood counts were performed to quantify platelet and leukocyte concentrations. PRPs were activated, or not, according to manufacturer instructions, and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), vascular endothelial growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were quantified. Differences among platelet, leukocyte, and growth factor concentration were compared among the different systems. Correlations between platelet and anabolic growth factor concentrations were assessed. Subsequently, PRP was made from 12 additional dogs using one of the devices. Each PRP was divided into three aliquots that were activated with calcium chloride (CaCl2), human γ-thrombin (HGT), or not activated. Expression of CD62P and platelet-bound fibrinogen (CAP1) was quantified for each activation group. Concentrations of TGF-β1, PDGF-BB, and TNF-α were also quantified for each activation group and a fourth group that was frozen/thawed. Differences among activation groups were assessed by a Friedman test. There were statistically significant differences among the PRPs made with difference devices with regard to platelet, leukocyte, TGF-β1, and PDGF-BB concentrations (p < 0.0001). There were weak to moderate correlations (R2 = 0.07-0.58) between platelet and anabolic growth factor concentrations but it appeared that activation had a greater effect on growth factor concentration than did cellular composition. Intentional platelet activation significantly increased CD62P and CAP1 expression as well as TGF-β1 and PDGF-BB concentrations in the one PRP in which all activation methods were assessed. Activation with HGT resulted in the greatest platelet activation, and CaCl2 and freeze/thaw elicited moderate increases in either growth factor release or CD62P and CAP1 expression. There are positive correlations between platelet and anabolic growth factor concentrations in canine PRPs. However, intentional platelet activation has a greater effect on growth factor delivery than platelet concentration. Thrombin provides more robust activation than CaCl2.

Highlights

  • Human and equine platelet-rich plasmas (PRPs) that are prepared with different methodologies vary notably in their cellular composition, growth factor concentrations, and catabolic cytokine concentrations [1,2,3,4]

  • The data from this study demonstrate that the specific leukocyte populations in the different PRPs differed dramatically depending upon the method of PRP preparation

  • Similar results were identified with another study of canine PRPs in which neutrophils comprised a substantial proportion of the leukocytes in PRPs made using System 3 and 4 [16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human and equine platelet-rich plasmas (PRPs) that are prepared with different methodologies vary notably in their cellular composition, growth factor concentrations, and catabolic cytokine concentrations [1,2,3,4]. The catabolic cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and TNF-α were positively correlated with the leukocyte concentration in two different human PRP preparations [4]. Three studies provide data on growth factor concentration(s) in three different canine PRPs [13, 17, 18]. Just one PRP preparation was assessed in each study, cytokine concentrations were not quantified, and assessment of possible associations between cellular composition and growth factor concentrations in different canine PRPs has not been performed. There remains a need to quantify growth factor and cytokine concentrations in different canine PRPs in order to fully characterize these products and to assess the relative impact of cellular composition on growth factor and cytokine delivery

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.