Abstract

Mode switching is beneficial to pacemaker patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. However, the optimal mode switching algorithm is still in evolution. Mode switching algorithms and atrial sensing circuitry can influence mode switching behavior. This study compared the mode switching behavior of four Medtronic, Inc. implantable devices: Thera DR model 7960 pacemaker, Kappa 700 model KDR701 pacemaker, Gem DR model 7271 dual chamber pacing defibrillator, and Jewel AF model 7250 dual chamber pacemaker atrial and ventricular defibrillator. The Thera and Gem DR use the same mean atrial rate mode switch algorithm. The Kappa and Jewel AF use four of seven short atrial intervals and an atrial fibrillation evidence counter algorithm, respectively. The Thera and Kappa devices use fixed gain sensing and the Gem DR and Jewel AF use autothreshold atrial sensing. Digitally recorded atrial electrograms from 52 episodes of human atrial fibrillation were fed into each device with differing simulated sinus rates before and after the atrial fibrillation. The percent of appropriate mode switching was highest for the Kappa 700 (94%) and lowest for the Thera (85%) (P = 0.046). The time to mode switching was significantly longer for the Thera and Gem DR compared to the Kappa 700 or Jewel AF (all P < 0.05). The time to mode switching was shorter for the Gem DR (9.0 +/- 1.6 s) using autothreshold atrial sensing than for the fixed gain Thera (11.1 +/- 2.1 s, P < 0.05). The mean atrial electrogram amplitude and cycle length were not correlated with the time to mode switching for any device. Faster sinus rates shortened the time to mode switching and prolonged the time to resynchronization in the two devices using the mean atrial interval algorithm. In conclusion, (1) mode switching function among these devices is influenced by algorithms and sensing circuitry, (2) the time to mode switching among these devices is influenced by the algorithm and use of autothreshold atrial sensing, and (3) the sinus rate before and after episodes of atrial fibrillation greatly influences the times to mode switching and resynchronization in devices using the mean atrial interval algorithm.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.