Abstract

Objective A sepsis protocol including institution-specific antibiotic recommendations based on local susceptibility patterns was implemented at our institution. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of these recommendations on the adequacy of initial empiric therapy in patients with severe sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study conducted in a medical intensive care unit at a university-affiliated medical center. Charts of patients identified as having sepsis in our sepsis database from November 2004 to September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Adequacy of initial therapy was assessed, as were the number of antibiotics used per patient and 28-day mortality. Results One hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria for the evaluation. Thirty-eight patients were in the pre-protocol group and 71 patients were in the post-protocol group. Adequacy of initial therapy increased from 68% pre protocol to 85% post protocol ( P < 0.05). A secondary analysis showed that if antibiotic recommendations had been followed exactly according to protocol, the number of antibiotics per patient would decrease from 2.47 to 2.11 ( P = 0.017) without changing adequacy of initial treatment. Conclusion Implementation of a sepsis protocol containing institution-specific antibiotic recommendations was associated with an increased percent of patients receiving adequate empiric antibiotic therapy. Strictly adhering to the institution-specific antibiotic recommendations could result in fewer antibiotics used per patient without reducing the adequacy of empiric treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.