Abstract

IntroductionTransgender persons are vulnerable to under-receipt of recommended health care due to chronic exposure to systemic stressors (e.g., discriminatory laws and health system practices). Scant information exists on receipt of alcohol-related care for transgender populations, and whether structural interventions to reduce transgender discrimination in health care improve receipt of recommended treatment. This study evaluated the effect of the Veteran Health Administration (VA) Transgender Healthcare Directive—a national policy to reduce structural discrimination—on receipt of evidence-based alcohol-related care for transgender VA patients with unhealthy alcohol use. MethodsThe study used an interrupted time series with control design to compare monthly receipt of alcohol-related care among transgender patients with unhealthy alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption ≥5) documented in their electronic health record before (10/1/2009–5/31/2011) and after (7/1/2011–7/31/2017) implementation of VA's Transgender Healthcare Directive. A propensity-score matched sample of non-transgender patients with unhealthy alcohol use served as a comparison group to control for concurrent secular trends. Mixed effects segmented logistic regression models estimated changes in level and slope (i.e., rate of change) in receipt of any evidence-based alcohol-related care, including brief intervention, specialty addictions treatment, and alcohol use disorder medications. ResultsThe matched sample (mean age = 47.5 [SD = 15.0]; 75% non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity) included 2074 positive alcohol screens completed by 1377 transgender patients and 6,l99 positive alcohol screens completed by 6185 non-transgender patients. Receipt of alcohol-related care increased for transgender patients from 78.5% (95% CI: 71.3%–85.6%) at the start of study to 83.0% (75.9%–90.1%) immediately before the directive and decreased slightly from 81.6% (77.4%–85.9%) immediately after the directive to 80.1% (76.8–85.4) at the end of the study. Changes in level and slope comparing periods before and after the directive were not statistically significant, nor were they statistically significantly different from the matched sample of non-transgender patients. ConclusionsHealth systems must urgently employ and evaluate policies to address structural stigma that produces and reproduces disparities in health and health care. Although VA's directive was not associated with increased receipt of alcohol-related care, that receipt of alcohol-related care among transgender patients is comparable to non-transgender patients is promising.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call