Abstract

This article is neither an empirical nor an analytical study; rather, it is a concise statement of a research paradigm that reflects the personal (and perhaps idiosyncratic) concerns of its author, which he wishes to continue and elaborate upon in much further detail at some point in the near future (if any). The general concern is with devising a functional criminological taxonomy of the multitudinous mutabilities migrating between neo-liberal political economy and organised and semi-organised criminality, here defined as criminogenic asymmetries. My central premise is this: although frequently associated in the scholarly literature with corruption, underdevelopment, anomie, and the breakdown of the brokerage of trust, neo-liberalism itself is the sufficient explanation for criminogenic asymmetries. As should be expected, the “moral panic” over the “death of democracy”, already part of our post-1989 history but currently symbolised by the “power crime” presidency of Donald J. Trump, w ill be utilised as the primary empirical example of these trends, both concurrent and convergent.

Highlights

  • Th is article is neither an em pirical nor an analytical study; rather, it is a concise statement of a research paradigm that reflects the personal concerns of its author, which he w ishes to continue and elaborate upon in much further detail at some point in the near future

  • The general concern is with devising a functional crim inological taxonomy of the multitudinous mutabilities m igrating between neo-liberal political economy and organised and sem i-organised crim inality, here defined as crim inogenic asymmetries

  • My central premise is this: frequently associated in the scholarly literature with corruption, underdevelopment, anomie, and the breakdown of the brokerage of trust, neo-liberalism itse lf is the sufficient explanation for crim inogenic asymmetries

Read more

Summary

Eric Wilson abstract

Th is article is neither an em pirical nor an analytical study; rather, it is a concise statement of a research paradigm that reflects the personal (and perhaps idiosyncratic) concerns of its author, which he w ishes to continue and elaborate upon in much further detail at some point in the near future (if any). The general concern is with devising a functional crim inological taxonomy of the multitudinous mutabilities m igrating between neo-liberal political economy and organised and sem i-organised crim inality, here defined as crim inogenic asymmetries. My central premise is this: frequently associated in the scholarly literature with corruption, underdevelopment, anomie, and the breakdown of the brokerage of trust, neo-liberalism itse lf is the sufficient explanation for crim inogenic asymmetries.

Эрик Уилсон аннотация
Findings
Friedrich von Hayek
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call