Abstract

The association of inflammatory cell infiltration with orthotopic rat liver transplant rejection was studied by immunopathologic evaluation of allografts at different time points using high- and low-responder strain combinations. PVG(RT-1c) recipients of ACI (RT-1a) liver transplants had prolonged survival (greater than 100 days) without immunosuppression. In contrast, Lewis (RT-1l) recipients of ACI liver transplants had severe acute rejection with mean survival of 10.7 +/- 0.5 days (n = 9). Graft recipients of both strain combinations, as well as control syngeneic PVG-to-PVG and Lewis-to-Lewis graft recipients were sacrificed at various time points posttransplant. Sections of livers were evaluated in a masked fashion for histologic changes as well as the extent and phenotype of cellular infiltrates, as determined by immunoperoxidase labeling using monoclonal antibodies OX1 (pan leukocyte), W3/13 (pan T cell), W3/25 (T helper cell:Th), and OX8 (T cytotoxic-suppressor:Tc-s). The results suggest that: the intensity and relative distribution of rat hepatic allograft T cell infiltrates at a given time point do not necessarily correlate with eventual outcome; the intensities of W3/25 (Th) and OX1 (pan-leukocyte) cell infiltrates parallel each other in both high- and low-responder strain combinations; the relative ratio of T cells (W3/13) to non-T cells increases over time in low-responder strains but remains relatively constant in high-responder strains during active rejection; and the relative ratio of W3/25:OX8 (Th:Tc-s) decreases in high-responder strains but increases in low-responder strains.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.